2004 Lincoln Aviator vs. 2006 Acura CSX
To start off, 2006 Acura CSX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln Aviator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln Aviator would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Aviator (302 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2006 Acura CSX. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Aviator should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 872 kg more than 2006 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln Aviator | 2006 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Lincoln | Acura |
| Model | Aviator | CSX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 302 HP | 197 HP |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2185 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
