2004 Lincoln Aviator vs. 2012 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2012 Nissan GT-R is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln Aviator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln Aviator would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan GT-R (530 HP) has 228 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln Aviator. (302 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln Aviator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 520 kg more than 2012 Nissan GT-R.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan GT-R (607 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Aviator. (407 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Aviator.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln Aviator | 2012 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Aviator | GT-R |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 530 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 607 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2257 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4671 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1369 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2779 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 74 L |