2004 Lincoln Aviator vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln Aviator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln Aviator would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Aviator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC60 (325 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln Aviator. (302 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln Aviator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 264 kg more than 2012 Volvo XC60.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (479 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Aviator. (407 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Aviator.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln Aviator | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
Model | Aviator | XC60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 325 HP |
Torque | 407 Nm | 479 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2185 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 70 L |