2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1960 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1960 ZAZ Jalta. (23 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1960 ZAZ Jalta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1087 kg more than 1960 ZAZ Jalta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 ZAZ Jalta. (44 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 1960 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Lincoln | ZAZ |
Model | LS | Jalta |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 23 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 44 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2030 mm |