2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1962 Seat 600
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1112 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 1962 Seat 600 | |
Make | Lincoln | Seat |
Model | LS | 600 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 19 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2010 mm |