2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 547 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Lincoln | Sunbeam |
Model | LS | Tiger |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 163 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 27 L |