2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 840 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 1969 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1969 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Lincoln | Lotus |
| Model | LS | Elan |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 889 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 59 L |
