2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 197 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 484 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
| Model | LS | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |
