2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Volvo |
| Model | LS | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 56 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
