2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (86 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 657 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 1980 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Lincoln | Mitsubishi |
Model | LS | Sigma |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2520 mm |