2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 547 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Lincoln | Toyota |
| Model | LS | Celica |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 1182 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2640 mm |
