2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1981 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 533 kg more than 1981 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1981 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Lincoln | Plymouth |
| Model | LS | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2260 mm |
