2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1982 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1079 kg more than 1982 Mini Clubman.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 1982 Mini Clubman has manual transmission. 1982 Mini Clubman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1982 Mini Clubman | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mini |
| Model | LS | Clubman |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2140 mm |
