2004 Lincoln LS vs. 1991 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1991 Pontiac Bonneville. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1991 Pontiac Bonneville. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 229 kg more than 1991 Pontiac Bonneville. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Pontiac Bonneville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Pontiac Bonneville. (271 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Pontiac Bonneville.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 1991 Pontiac Bonneville | |
| Make | Lincoln | Pontiac |
| Model | LS | Bonneville |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 96.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |
