2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2002 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 35 kg more than 2004 Lincoln LS.

Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Lincoln LS 2002 Ford Ranger
Make Lincoln Ford
Model LS Ranger
Year Released 2004 2002
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2967 cc 2300 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 229 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 6750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 207 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1685 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4940 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 55 L