2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2005 Mazda Marathon
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Marathon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 170 kg more than 2005 Mazda Marathon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Marathon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 2005 Mazda Marathon | |
| Make | Lincoln | Mazda |
| Model | LS | Marathon |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2260 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 10 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1517 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |
