2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 143 more horse power than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (137 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan X-Trail.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. (198 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan X-Trail. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
| Model | LS | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 137 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |
