2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln LS. (232 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln LS. (298 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Lincoln | Land Rover |
Model | LS | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 311 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 700 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2891 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 104 L |