2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2011 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 910 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. (71 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Matiz. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2011 Chevrolet Matiz has manual transmission. 2011 Chevrolet Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 2011 Chevrolet Matiz | |
| Make | Lincoln | Chevrolet |
| Model | LS | Matiz |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 68.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2350 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |
