2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2012 Chevrolet Volt
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Volt is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 14 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Volt.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Volt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln LS | 2012 Chevrolet Volt | |
| Make | Lincoln | Chevrolet |
| Model | LS | Volt |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |
