2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2012 Ford Galaxy
To start off, 2012 Ford Galaxy is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 137 more horse power than 2012 Ford Galaxy. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Galaxy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 619 kg more than 2012 Ford Galaxy. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Galaxy. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Galaxy. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Galaxy has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Galaxy will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 2012 Ford Galaxy | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | LS | Galaxy |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1729 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |