2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (261 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln LS. (232 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan NV weights approximately 948 kg more than 2004 Lincoln LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (381 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln LS. (298 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 2012 Nissan NV | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | LS | NV |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 2635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 6111 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2131 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3711 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 106 L |