2004 Lincoln LS vs. 2012 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2012 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (229 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot RCZ. (197 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot RCZ.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot RCZ has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot RCZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lincoln LS | 2012 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Lincoln | Peugeot |
Model | LS | RCZ |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1359 mm |