2004 Lincoln Mark X vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln Mark X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln Mark X would be higher. At 3,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln Mark X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln Mark X. (280 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln Mark X.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lincoln Mark X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Mark X. (388 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Mark X.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lincoln Mark X | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Audi |
| Model | Mark X | RS3 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3900 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 233 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
