2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1955 MG Magnett
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 MG Magnett would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 785 more horse power than 1955 MG Magnett. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1955 MG Magnett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 MG Magnett weights approximately 15 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 883 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 MG Magnett. (107 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 1955 MG Magnett | |
Make | Lotec | MG |
Model | C 1000 | Magnett |
Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1490 mm |