2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1965 TVR Trident
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 TVR Trident. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 TVR Trident would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 573 more horse power than 1965 TVR Trident. (271 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1965 TVR Trident. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 TVR Trident weights approximately 90 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 564 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 TVR Trident. (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 TVR Trident.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 1965 TVR Trident | |
Make | Lotec | TVR |
Model | C 1000 | Trident |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 426 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1670 mm |