2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 755 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 832 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lotec | Triumph |
Model | C 1000 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1430 mm |