2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1969 Pontiac GTO

To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,548 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP) has 419 more horse power than 1969 Pontiac GTO. (425 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1969 Pontiac GTO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 320 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Lotec C 1000 1969 Pontiac GTO
Make Lotec Pontiac
Model C 1000 GTO
Year Released 2004 1969
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 5500 cc 6548 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 844 HP 425 HP
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 5140 mm
Vehicle Width 2010 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1150 mm 1330 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]