2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1989 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 644 more horse power than 1989 Mazda RX-7. (200 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda RX-7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 726 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda RX-7. (264 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 1989 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Lotec | Mazda |
Model | C 1000 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 264 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1270 mm |