2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP) has 684 more horse power than 1991 Lotus Elan. (160 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1991 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 83 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 847 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Lotus Elan. (143 Nm). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Lotec | Lotus |
Model | C 1000 | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 990 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1240 mm |