2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 654 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (190 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 684 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Lotec | Rover |
Model | C 1000 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1830 mm |