2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1999 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 676 more horse power than 1999 Opel Omega. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1999 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Omega weights approximately 630 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 763 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (227 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 1999 Opel Omega | |
Make | Lotec | Opel |
Model | C 1000 | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 227 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1510 mm |