2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2006 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 704 more horse power than 2006 Toyota MR2. (140 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 759 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota MR2. (231 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotec C 1000 | 2006 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Lotec | Toyota |
Model | C 1000 | MR2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 844 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 231 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1250 mm |