2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2010 Maybach 62

To start off, 2010 Maybach 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2010 Maybach 62. (631 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Maybach 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1796 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Maybach 62 (999 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lotec C 1000. (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2010 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lotec C 1000. 2010 Maybach 62 has automatic transmission and 2004 Lotec C 1000 has manual transmission. 2004 Lotec C 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Maybach 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: