2004 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP) has 602 more horse power than 2011 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 660 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Lotec C 1000 | 2011 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Lotec | Holden |
| Model | C 1000 | UTE |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 844 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
