2004 Lotus Elise vs. 1981 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2004 Lotus Elise is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 402 kg more than 2004 Lotus Elise.
Because 2004 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Lotus Elise | 1981 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Lotus | Plymouth |
Model | Elise | Reliant |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2260 mm |