2004 Mahindra Armada vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo

To start off, 2004 Mahindra Armada is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (120 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 850 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.

Because 2004 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Mazda Cosmo has automatic transmission and 2004 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 2004 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Mazda Cosmo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: