2004 Mahindra Armada vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 209 kg more than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Because 2004 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo XC60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mahindra Armada | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Volvo |
| Model | Armada | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1791 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4627 mm |
