2004 Mahindra CL vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 2004 Mahindra CL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mahindra CL weights approximately 160 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Because 2004 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (149 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2004 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mahindra CL | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
Model | CL | 626 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |