2004 Mahindra Commander vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mahindra Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mahindra Commander would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra Commander.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mahindra Commander. (124 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mahindra Commander | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
Model | Commander | CX-7 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2112 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2760 mm |