2004 Mahindra Scorpio vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Mahindra Scorpio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2004 Mahindra Scorpio. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2004 Mahindra Scorpio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mahindra Scorpio weights approximately 260 kg more than 1996 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Mahindra Scorpio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mahindra Scorpio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mahindra Scorpio. (260 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mahindra Scorpio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mahindra Scorpio | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mahindra | Renault |
| Model | Scorpio | Clio |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2609 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2490 mm |
