2004 Marcos TS vs. 2006 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Marcos TS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Marcos TS would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2004 Marcos TS. (177 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2004 Marcos TS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 341 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Marcos TS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Marcos TS. (224 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Marcos TS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Marcos TS | 2006 Mazda MPV | |
Make | Marcos | Mazda |
Model | TS | MPV |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 2544 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2850 mm |