2004 Marcos TS vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Marcos TS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Marcos TS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 435 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS.
Because 2004 Marcos TS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Marcos TS | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Marcos | Chevrolet |
Model | TS | Equinox |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2858 mm |