2004 Marcos TS vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Marcos TS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Marcos TS would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2004 Marcos TS. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2004 Marcos TS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 738 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (600 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Marcos TS. (224 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Marcos TS.

Compare all specifications: