2004 Marcos TS vs. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Marcos TS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Marcos TS would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Cruze weights approximately 152 kg more than 2004 Marcos TS.
Because 2004 Marcos TS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Marcos TS | 2013 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Marcos | Chevrolet |
Model | TS | Cruze |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1427 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2685 mm |