2004 Maserati Coupe vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Maserati Coupe is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,245 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Maserati Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Coupe (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Coupe should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maserati Coupe weights approximately 736 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Maserati Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maserati Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Coupe (451 Nm) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (185 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Maserati Coupe | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Maserati | Renault |
Model | Coupe | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4245 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 451 Nm | 185 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.1:1 | 18.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 3.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.5 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.2 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 50 L |