2004 Maserati Coupe vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Maserati Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Maserati Coupe would be higher. At 4,245 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Maserati Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Coupe (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Coupe should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maserati Coupe weights approximately 529 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Maserati Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maserati Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Coupe (451 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Maserati Coupe | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Maserati | Mazda |
Model | Coupe | 3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4245 cc | 1597 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 451 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 55 L |