2004 Maserati Coupe vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Maserati Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Maserati Coupe would be higher. At 4,244 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Maserati Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati Coupe (395 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati Coupe should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati Coupe (451 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jaguar XF. (450 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Maserati Coupe | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Maserati | Jaguar |
Model | Coupe | XF |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4244 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 451 Nm | 450 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.9 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 70 L |