2004 Maserati MC12 vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Maserati MC12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Maserati MC12 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Maserati MC12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati MC12 (622 HP) has 382 more horse power than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati MC12 should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati MC12 (652 Nm) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati MC12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Maserati MC12 | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Maserati | Holden |
| Model | MC12 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 622 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 652 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
