2004 Maserati MC12 vs. 2009 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2009 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Maserati MC12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Maserati MC12 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Maserati MC12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maserati MC12 (622 HP) has 474 more horse power than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maserati MC12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2004 Maserati MC12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maserati MC12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maserati MC12 (652 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Maserati MC12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daewoo Tocsa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Maserati MC12 | 2009 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Maserati | Daewoo |
| Model | MC12 | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 622 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 652 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2100 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
